Death..
is it the end of life??or is it a new beginning ??
a question that has been plaguing the human brain ever since it became the most developed system on the earth.
the most clinical explanation of death is the state of body wen the body ceases to carry out normal functions but is it really only that?? how can u not define death as something that causes temporary loss of emotions(normal ones), temporary loss of brain functionality, temporary insanity and sometimes in extreme cases permanent insanity.. u might ask me now if i've become insane.. i would say no.. why is death always defined with respect to the one no longer there wat abt the ppl left behind isnt it better to define death in terms of these ppl who have carry on rather the ones who have already left us.. shudn't there be much more attention given to them (and pls pitying them is not altogether a very good option).. does one death cause another death??does it make these ppl loose the will to live.. sometimes yes.. sometimes these ppl get a new purpose in life (and i mean sometimes..) then shudnt death be defined also as a means for a person to find a new purpose a new vocation a new chance..
notice that i've been speaking of death as the end, the last stage ,the ultimatum of the person's life...
but wat if it is not wat if there exists a parallel world which has ppl living there with no recollection of their lives on this dimension isnt that a new beginning?? but since we can never be sure of wat exactly happens to anybody after they die, the confusion regarding death will continue long after we ourselves cease to exist.
is it the end of life??or is it a new beginning ??
a question that has been plaguing the human brain ever since it became the most developed system on the earth.
the most clinical explanation of death is the state of body wen the body ceases to carry out normal functions but is it really only that?? how can u not define death as something that causes temporary loss of emotions(normal ones), temporary loss of brain functionality, temporary insanity and sometimes in extreme cases permanent insanity.. u might ask me now if i've become insane.. i would say no.. why is death always defined with respect to the one no longer there wat abt the ppl left behind isnt it better to define death in terms of these ppl who have carry on rather the ones who have already left us.. shudn't there be much more attention given to them (and pls pitying them is not altogether a very good option).. does one death cause another death??does it make these ppl loose the will to live.. sometimes yes.. sometimes these ppl get a new purpose in life (and i mean sometimes..) then shudnt death be defined also as a means for a person to find a new purpose a new vocation a new chance..
notice that i've been speaking of death as the end, the last stage ,the ultimatum of the person's life...
but wat if it is not wat if there exists a parallel world which has ppl living there with no recollection of their lives on this dimension isnt that a new beginning?? but since we can never be sure of wat exactly happens to anybody after they die, the confusion regarding death will continue long after we ourselves cease to exist.
7.